Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

대한신장학회


간행물 검색

현재 페이지 경로
  • HOME
  • 간행물
  • 간행물 검색
논문분류 춘계학술대회 초록집
제목 Era-Dependent Attenuation of Outcome Disparities in High-Risk Kidney Transplantation Over Five Decades — A Single-Center Experience of 4,024 Cases
저자 Seunghyeon Kim
출판정보 2026; 2026(1):
키워드 Kidney transplantation, High-risk transplantation, Era-dependent ouctcome change, Death-censored graft survival, competing risk analysis
초록 Objectives: Kidney transplantation (KT) has increasingly involved immunologically and medically complex recipients over recent decades. However, whether the historical outcome disadvantage associated with high-risk KT has been attenuated across transplant eras — and whether immunologic and medical risk carry distinct temporal trajectories — remains poorly defined in long-term, large-volume cohort data. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed KT performed between 1969 and 2025, stratified into four eras (1969-1999 (n = 677), 2000-2009 (n = 675), 2010-2019 (n = 1515), and 2020-2025 (n=1157). High-risk KT was defined as either immunologic risk (desensitization, panel reactive antibody>50%, HLA 6 mismatch, or anti-thymocyte globulin induction) or medical risk (recipient age≥65 years, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, or re-transplantation). The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival (DCGS), estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis, stratified Cox proportional hazards models and Fine-Gray competing risk analysis with death as a competing event. Results: Both immunologic and medical high-risk KT increased substantially across eras, rising from 0.3% and 4.9% in 1969–1999 to 45.4% and 45.3% in 2020–2025, respectively. Despite this increase, overall DCGS did not deteriorate across the eras. In era-stratified analyses, immunologic high-risk KT was not associated with inferior DCGS in any era (HR range 0.81–2.04; all p>0.05). Medical high-risk KT was significantly associated with inferior DCGS in earlier eras (Era 1: HR 1.46 [95% CI 1.01–2.12], p=0.045; Era 2: HR 2.54 [95% CI 1.61–4.03], p<0.001), but this risk disadvantage was progressively attenuated and was no longer apparent in contemporary eras. Fine-Gray competing risk analyses corroborated these findings (Era 2: sHR 1.80 [95% CI 1.09–2.97], p=0.022; Eras 3–4: p>0.05). Conclusion: The outcome disadvantage of medically high-risk KT has been progressively eliminated over five decades, supporting continued expansion of KT to higher-risk candidates.
원문(PDF) PDF 원문보기
위로가기